Detailed Notes on case laws on partnership act
Detailed Notes on case laws on partnership act
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and higher than all assure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of the boy or Female tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi read more Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws of the United States and this State.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is actually a legislation that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, alternatively than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions would be the opinions that are filed over the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Summaries of cases that form the lives of younger individuals, making certain a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fans alike.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.